next »

[jdillon]

I am getting a strange error. Whenever events fall on the last day of the month, I get the following message:

ERROR PROCESSING TEMPLATE
There was an error in your template file. Below is the template file and also the perl code generated from it to help you with debugging.

Day '32' out of range 1..31 at (eval 1) line 64

And here is line 64:
$schedules = &Event::getEventsInRange($db,timegm(0,0,0,$DATE,$MONTH-1,$YEAR-1900),timegm(0,0,0,$DATE+1,$MONTH-1,$YEAR-1900)-1);

We are in the process of migrating to a new web server (Linux box/Apache 1.3/Perl 5.8.3) and I do not get the error on the current server (the one we are migrating from).

I have tried deleting the events and adding them back with no luck. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!
Jon Dillon

[This message has been edited by jdillon (edited March 27, 2004).]

[DanO]

Have you made sure the time zone offset is set correctly in the 'Template Options'(?) section? I don't know if that would cause it but may be possible.

Dan O.

------------------

[jdillon]

Thanks DanO. I checked but the time zone offset is set correctly. Does anyone have any other ideas?

Thanks--Jon

------------------

[Zim]

Its complaint is legitimate    You are asking it (on line 64) for the events from 4/30/2004 to 4/(30+1)/2004  (note the $DATE + 1)

Not sure why a getEventsInRange (for a 2-day period) is happening, when all you want is the detail view of one event.

Not a fix, but a step towards the problem.

Mike

------------------

[jdillon]

Mike,

I got the code in question from a post by TubaDave back on May 2, 2002 (http://www.calendarscript.com/support/forum/Forum4/HTML/000169.html).

This code is used to get the date and time into the events view. I tried taking the DATE+1 out of that line and it broke the script. I don't know enough Perl to explain why it is needed but apparently it is.

Jon

------------------

[Zim]

In the thread you reference, see the 2nd to bottom post by johannes.

Mike

------------------

[jdillon]

That did it Mike! Should have read that post through again. I appreciate your help.

Jon

------------------